ISO's can be both modes.. cooked or raw... the same with BIN's...
Originally posted by slacker52@Nov 27, 2003 @ 05:10 PM
iso/music=only a perfectionist nutcase would realy care, sure sound quality is lost but not that much
Bin+Cue = best
NRG or Clone CD = second best
CDI = third best
Iso+mp3 = fourth best
What about Clone CD images? They include the multisession info, don't they?
With iso/mp3, the usual standard 'postgap 00:02:00 after track one' thing is used - but that's rarely the correct location for track 2, let alone all remaining audio tracks.
keeping in mind of course that im not perfectionist nutcase, just a nutcase :looneyonly a perfectionist nutcase would realy care
Originally posted by mal@Nov 27, 2003 @ 10:33 PM
Jaded and Tagrineth, no DC copy talk please.
Originally posted by Gallstaff@Nov 28, 2003 @ 12:28 AM
Bah I say beggers can't be choosers and since no one here is paying for the iso/mp3's or bin/cue's in question, we shouldnt' be debating which format is better or not.
I dunno that's just my thoughts
Edit: Added: Oh, and there's one fatal flaw that bin/cue and CloneCD have which automatically discount them from possibly being the best format: Lose the cue sheet or CloneCD control file, and your image becomes completely worthless.
Originally posted by Tagrineth@Nov 28, 2003 @ 07:05 PM
Oh, and there's one fatal flaw that bin/cue and CloneCD have which automatically discount them from possibly being the best format: Lose the cue sheet or CloneCD control file, and your image becomes completely worthless.
If I'll ever finish setting up my Linux boxen, I might put up some donkey releases, and for sure they will be bin/cue exlusivly.