Starfox

[IceDigger]

A new Starfox game, Starfox Assualt, will be released by Nintendo for the Gamecube February 24th!

If you love the Starfox series they I know you can't resist not to get this title

 

[racketboy]

I'm very interested to see how this one turns out!

 

[schi0249]

A traditional Star Fox I hope. I really disliked the last one.

 

[CrazyGoon]

Yeah, I would love to see another action packed 3D shooter game in the likes of the original.

 

[sparkster_vbulletin3_import16216]

Looks very promising!

 

[Pyrite]

Too small to see, loved the N64 version to bits!

 

[BJammzz]

My first N64 game was starfox . Can't wait till this comes out. This and Zelda are the 2 big ones I am waiting for.

 

[Ian Van Dahl]

They're going to mess it up, just like they did the last one.

 

[Dark Samurai]

They're going to mess it up, just like they did the last one.

But this one is made by Namco, the last one was made by Rare...

 

[CrazyGoon]

But this one is made by Namco, the last one was made by Rare...

And the original was made by Nintendo. What's with all the licensing of this franchise anyway?

 

[Pyrite]

Nintendo is tied up on work with the three systems I guess thats why they ask other studios to help them out. The RARE staff that worked on N64 is not the same of today and it shows with crappy titles I don't know if they still work as a studio after being bought by M$.

 

[Dark Samurai]

The RARE staff that worked on N64 is not the same of today and it shows with crappy titles I don't know if they still work as a studio after being bought by M$.

And its a good thing that M$ did buy Rare, or else the GC would be considered even more of a kiddy system by Nintendo haters, considering the only game that I know of that came out for the Xbox was in fact a kiddy game...

 

[Ian Van Dahl]

But this one is made by Namco, the last one was made by Rare...

Hmmm...this will be interesting. *rubs goetee*

 

[Pyrite]

Check the new videos of StarFox Assault:
http://www.webotaku.com/pages/jeuxvideo/ne...hp?id_news=3941

This is what they should have done in the start instead of the adventure game.

 

[Supergrom_vbulletin3_import15713]

IGN gave it a 7.0. though we all know how reliable their reviews can be. the reader average at this point is an 8.9, though im too lazy to actually read the substance of why.

 

[BJammzz]

bah! can't we have a true port of the origionals?!?! Why all this shooter BS?

 

[CrazyGoon]

Jeez, I just read that IGN review, and it was like: "winge, winge, winge". 6 hours not long enough? Not innovative enough?. When you criticise something you need to understand what is important and what isn't. Length and innovation are not important, not in the long run.

At least I found what I was looking for - how the gameplay is set out. Was it a shooter, or free-roaming crap? As Matt thankfully pointed out for me: "Sadly, these latter level types outweigh the on-rails selection by a margin of at least two-to-one, which is bound to disappoint purists looking for something truly reminiscent of the older titles."

bah! can't we have a true port of the origionals?!?! Why all this shooter BS?

You mad at the fact that there is too much objective-based free-roaming crap? Couldn't understand your last sentence

 

[BJammzz]

the ground mission stuff. Even on SF64 the tank was ok, but it was used in moderation so it was cool when you did play a level w/ it, same w/ the submarine. In this is outweights it 2-1 and it's not even the cool tank shit! just the running around on foot crap. Just kinda urks me cuz this and Zelda were the 2 I was looking at this year and I don't know about my beloved SF anymore :-\

 

[CrazyGoon]

Ya know, IF the game was less innovative, it would have been a lot better (at least to me and Bjammzz), 'cause it would be more like the original and SF64
.. not to say it can't be fun though I guess we'll have to wait and see.

 

[BJammzz]

ya, hopefully. If not, there is always Zelda which looks fuckin badass to say the least