The cause is the movements of tectonic plates. It doesn't keep the enviroment in check. It just happens, there's a reason, but the reason isn't to destroy life in an area. That's just the inevitable result. 🙁Originally posted by Pearl Jammzz@Mon, 2004-12-27 @ 06:22 PM
I think it's sad that these thinsg happen BUT I understand they happen for a reason...it's natures way of keepin the enviroment in check. Just liek diseases/plagues/tornados/etc.
Originally posted by SkankinMonkey@Tue, 2004-12-28 @ 01:25 PM
Probably not, people are pretty bad about staying in disaster prone areas (see: Florida, Japan, France)
Originally posted by reX dart: eskimo spy@Tue, 2004-12-28 @ 07:21 PM
You mentioned, Ice, that it was the biggest quake in forty years. Do you happen to know where that other quake happened, and what its toll was?
The underwater quake, which the U.S. Geological Survey put at magnitude 9.0, was the biggest since 1964, when a 9.2-magnitude temblor struck Alaska, also touching off tsunami waves. There were at least a half-dozen powerful aftershocks, one of magnitude 7.3.
Enzo Boschi, the head of Italy's National Geophysics Institute, likened the quake's power to detonating a million atomic bombs the size of those dropped on Japan during World War II, and said the shaking was so powerful it even disturbed the Earth's rotation.
That was for initial assistance. What did the UN initially pledge? If you knew how these things worked, you'd know more is on the way. On top of that, look at the total amount the US spent in 2004 on foreign aid. We have, are, and will continue to doll out large sums of cash.Originally posted by schi0249@Thu, 2004-12-30 @ 01:25 PM
And Bush thinks $34 million is sufficient?