Hey Guys,
I'm working on a low-budget (really low budget) feature film and we've been juggling around various types of prosumer DV cameras. I'm not a fan of DV at all, but this is my first job and you work with what you got.
Have any of you guys seen "Party Monster" with Culkin? I caught a bit of it on cable tv several months ago when I was home and I was intrigued with the image, especially the color rendition. What do you guys think of the look?
I have read several technical websites, all of them lambasting the Canon XL1s. Most seem to laude the Panasonic DV100 as the most "film-like" but after seeing a student film that used the camera, I'm left non-plussed. Granted, in low-light situations it looked quite well, but anything above, I don't know, 3 stops and it's back to videoville.
From what I've gathered, it's best to shoot with less light if want a more "film-look", but then again what's the point when you're shooting digital anyway? I guess right now I'm frustrated that I have to use a digital cam instead of a nice 35mm camera. That's why the XL2 interests me: I like the look of it.
Have any of you guys seen "Party Monster" with Culkin? It was flimed on an older model , the XL1s. I caught a bit of it on cable tv several months ago when I was home and I was intrigued with the image, especially the color rendition. What do you guys think of the look?
I'm working on a low-budget (really low budget) feature film and we've been juggling around various types of prosumer DV cameras. I'm not a fan of DV at all, but this is my first job and you work with what you got.
Have any of you guys seen "Party Monster" with Culkin? I caught a bit of it on cable tv several months ago when I was home and I was intrigued with the image, especially the color rendition. What do you guys think of the look?
I have read several technical websites, all of them lambasting the Canon XL1s. Most seem to laude the Panasonic DV100 as the most "film-like" but after seeing a student film that used the camera, I'm left non-plussed. Granted, in low-light situations it looked quite well, but anything above, I don't know, 3 stops and it's back to videoville.
From what I've gathered, it's best to shoot with less light if want a more "film-look", but then again what's the point when you're shooting digital anyway? I guess right now I'm frustrated that I have to use a digital cam instead of a nice 35mm camera. That's why the XL2 interests me: I like the look of it.
Have any of you guys seen "Party Monster" with Culkin? It was flimed on an older model , the XL1s. I caught a bit of it on cable tv several months ago when I was home and I was intrigued with the image, especially the color rendition. What do you guys think of the look?