Originally posted by farugoth@Feb 26, 2003 @ 05:56 AM
So, you suggest we try to solve every problem that comes along in life, even if the chance of a "holocaust" scenario is dim? [SNIP] Some believe that we should shoot capitalists in the streets. Ask yourself: what is the "better place?"
Nice sentiments, but flawed logic. The utilization of that quote was to bring the the whole issue full circle - that it's not just a blind association, but in many circles, it is a Holocaust, but for animals. And as googlefest pointed out, it's very inhumane, how animals are treated. The problem is that since they aren't humans, it's not deplorable.
Preventing Hitler did not mean preventing World War I. When Hitler took power, France and Britain both looked at history and thought 'hmm, last time we pushed the enemy, we instigated war. This time, we'll let Hitler take over those countries'. Obviously, that was a terrible decision on multiple levels. First, they based their decision on the assumption that Hitler was of sane mind and conscience, neither of which he was (and they had such information indicating such). Second, they thought he would, on the basis of the rules of war, announce ultimatums before attacking. He did not. Stalin especially was caught in this conundrum, which is why Russia fell as quickly as it did (and if it weren't for the winter, they'd have certainly lost).
Now what is my logic? MY logic is if there are offenses being done, then we should speak against them. Obviously, Hitler attacking and adding to the German Empire is an offensive tactic. Attacking Saddam Hussein in a pre-emptive strike is not. He may have weapons, but he's not an idiot. Nor is he aligned with Al Qaeda, no matter how much Bush wishes it were so. However, there are tragedies occuring in Iraq as well, but war is not the answer, diplomacy is.
What I was/am suggesting is such - if there is such an issue which is so divergent from peace and equality for all, then it should be addressed. The Holocaust SHOULD have been addressed. Are you suggesting that Hitler should have stopped himself? What utter nonsense! What person of sane mind would suggest such a thing??
What is a better place? That's a pretty nebulous idea. Peace? Using renewable energy? The end of epidemics? Equality for all? Perhaps I'm an optimist, but I think it's misguided to believe that things should go as they are, simply because.