It says that she played the role at the Tokyo Game Show, not that she was modeled after her.
Keep in mind, Dee-lite's get-up preceded Ulala's by a great number of years. Another issue is that if Ulala was modeled after the person in the link, it wasn't for her look (I'm assuming that this person had a greater role than that of the model at a game show).
EDIT: I probably should add this. Losses don't just mean how much Dee-Lite 'lost' because someone stole her schtik, but also whatever Sega gained by 'stealing it'.
It all really depends on which side the judge sees more. Dee-lite could argue she due royalties, and Sega could argue she hasn't done anything recently nor would anyone associate her with Ulala. The only issues of contention is Sega's 'history' in this, and Dee-Lite's claim.
Keep in mind, Dee-lite's get-up preceded Ulala's by a great number of years. Another issue is that if Ulala was modeled after the person in the link, it wasn't for her look (I'm assuming that this person had a greater role than that of the model at a game show).
EDIT: I probably should add this. Losses don't just mean how much Dee-Lite 'lost' because someone stole her schtik, but also whatever Sega gained by 'stealing it'.
It all really depends on which side the judge sees more. Dee-lite could argue she due royalties, and Sega could argue she hasn't done anything recently nor would anyone associate her with Ulala. The only issues of contention is Sega's 'history' in this, and Dee-Lite's claim.