Originally posted by Lyzel@Aug 29, 2003 @ 07:47 PM
But you're right in one thing, I don't want to discuss this. I already know we have a bunch of cowards in this forum.
I wouldn't say cowards. I would say rational.
YOU may think it's ok, but for those people in the military, how do you tell the families of the military people that the US is sending them to fight a war that we have no business fighting?
There's also the issue of funding. How does deficit spending work? Rather, do YOU know how deficit spending works?
When countries hold the power to destroy other countries, you don't call their bluff. Japan called ours, and how many people did we evaporate? (If it were any other culture other than Japan, arguably the war would've gone on longer) If anything, 9/11 and the continued losses we're sustaining in a supposed peaceful Iraq shows how vulnerable we are. And the continued acts of terrorism.
But, realistically, what does a show of force do? Has it ever convinced people to run and hide in fear? The main crux of terrorism IS fear. If 9/11 has demonstrated anything, a show of force only asks for more force. Another very easy example - the continual bombing of England by the Axis. Did they run? Did they succumb to the 'greater force'?
Finally, my last example, is one that every American born school child understands - the Revolutionary War. The British realistically outgunned and outpowered the US Military. But the British didn't count on one thing - fighting on your own ground, own territory. Soldiers are dying in Arabia not just because of hostile attacks, but not having been brought up in that area and forced to acclimate under heavy duress (the pneumonia like symptoms? apparently has to do with the constant inhalation of sand and smoke).
Technology is finite, as is the capacity to see outside of the box. You can label anyone a coward - I've labeled you naive. But it's easy to call people names behind a computer.